* The war of words in Iraq. A Reuters article about the Iraqi's use of Arab insults to depict the US.
* How the current anti-war-in-Iraq movements differ from the anti-war-in-Vietnam movements of the '60s. A Reuters story.
(more: http://moveon.org)
March 2003 Archives
RESOURCES ABOUT "THE ARAB CNN," AL-JAZEERA TV:
* Al-Jazeera's English-language page, as captured by a site called "The Memory Hole," on March 25, before it was hacked.
* A Newsweek article about Al-Jazeera's objectivity.
* Another Newsweek piece about Al-Jazeera.
* A Press Freedom Report on Al-Jazeera (subtitles: "A popular channel," "Pressure from the US," "A biased, anti-American channel?")
* A Committee to Protect Journalists protest against US attempts to influence Al-Jazeera.
* A whole series of articles about Al-Jazeera, from The Guardian and The LA Times, to The New York Times and Reuters.
* "In defense of Al-Jazeera," from MSNBC News.
* "Inside Al-Jazeera," from the Columbia Journalism Review.
Iraq situation updated as of Sunday, March 30 (according to Reuters):
CASUALTIES:
* U.S. -- At least 45 killed, 17 missing
* Britain -- 24 killed
* Iraqi military -- no confirmed figures
* Iraqi civilians (Iraqi estimates) -- 589 killed, 4,582 injured
More international media sources (English version):
* Arab News (Saudi Arabia)
* Dar Al Hayat (London)
* Afghan News Network (Afghanistan)
* China Daily (China)
* The Jakarta Times (Indonesia)
* Korean News (North Korea!)
* Dawn (Pakistan)
* Viet Nam News (Vietnam)
* Bahrain Tribune (Bahrain)
* Gulf Daily News (Bahrain)
* Cairo Times (Egypt)
* Islamic Republic News Agency (Iran)
* Kuwait Times (Kuwait)
* Kurdish Observer (Turkey)
* The Independent (Papua New Guinea :o)
Raz has been outdoing me in here. Geez! What does he think I invited him in here to do, make me look bad? :-)
Dunno if he found this one yet, a warblog from a US soldier.
A funny piece of news. Last week, the US government announced that a few dozen countries around the world support the war in Iraq (the so-called "coalition of the willing"). As a reward, most of these countries are going to receive US foreign aid. Some of them are explicitly included in Bush's proposed budget for 2004 (see below). The Central European country of Slovenia was slated to receive $4.5 million, as a "thank you" for supporting the war. Only, Slovenia does NOT support the war!! Here are some excerpts from an article about this incredible blunder on the part of the US budget planners:
"One day after hundreds of Slovenians hit the streets to protest the inclusion of their nation in the US war budget, Prime Minister Anton Rop said Washington had goofed. When we asked for an explanation, the State Department told us we were named in the document by mistake as we are not a member of the coalition against Iraq," Rop told a hastily arranged news conference. Slovenia was one of the states named in the $75-billion US war budget, which must be approved by Congress and includes grants to partners in the US-led military action. Slovenia was slated to get $4,5-million from the budget, which Rop said will not be forthcoming."
One great resource for videos is the UMass library. The AIMS collection there provides hundreds of good videos (media literacy, history, political science, etc.) to instructors. All you have to do is go to the third floor, to the Reserve section, and tell the workstudy people there that you are an instructor and that you need this and this video. You will have to fill in a form to order the videos and you will be able to pick them up in a couple of days at the most. Of course, prior to ordering the videos, you will have decided which ones you want to view. You can do that by going to the UMass library on-line catalogue page, click on "Keyword", set "Material Type" to "Videos, films and slides" and then write your key term in the search box. If you're not looking for anything specific, you might want to type in "Frontline," or "Inside Story" (i.e. series name) or "PBS," or "BBC," (i.e. institution name) and you'll get a whole bunch of titles. The Inter-5college borrowing system holds for videos, too.
Some international media sources (English versions):
- ONLINE NEWSPAPERS FROM AROUND THE WORLD (almost 100 countries represented)
- Der Spiegel (Germany)
- The New Zealand Herald
- Lebanon online news
- Le Monde Diplomatique (French political newspaper, features Edward Said, Arundhati Roy, etc.)
- Pravda (Russia)
- Deutsche Welle (Germany)
- Radio Sweden (on-line news)
- The Guardian (UK)
* Article arguing that America is a "Global Rogue State"
* A guide to American Military Bases Around the World.
* Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting (lots of stuff on media coverage of the war in Iraq)
* The Third World Traveler (alternative media - i.e. anti-war, anti-corporate, anti-globalization stuff)
* List of dictators who have been supported by the US over time
* Iraq body count (civilian deaths)
* More independent media
* A good warblog (news, many links)
* A Newsweek article about "embedded" journalists
* Committee to Protect Journalists and Reporters Without Borders
"The Coalition of the Billing" (or "Proposed US Aid for Countries Who Are Supporting the War in Iraq"):
* total figure of hand-outs: $7.8 billion (to this figure add loans and loan guarantees)
* Turkey: $1 billion in cash grants, with which Turkey can secure loans up to $8.5 billion (Turkey provided air corridors for planes bombing Iraq)
* Israel: $1 billion in military aid, $9 billion loan guarantees
* $ hundreds of millions (exact figures unclear): Jordan, Egypt, Pakistan
* $90 million to Bahrain (the country hosts the command center and the port of the 5th US Fleet)
* $61,5 million to Oman (the island of Masirah is used as a military base by the US)
* $15 million to Djibouti (hosts thousands of American troops on its territory)
* $15 million to Hungary (agreed to train Iraqi opposition on its territory, also hosts a US air force base)
* $15 million to Poland (has committed to send troops to Iraq)
* $15 million to the Czech Republic
* unspecified figure: Slovenia, Slovakia, Romania, the Phillipines
Sources: Evenimentul Zilei, CNN
Bush's proposed budget for 2004:
* total figure: $2.2 trillion
* calls for a $15 billion increase in military spending
* $2.3 billion in aid to "vulnerable states on the front line of the war against terrorism like Afghanistan and Turkey."
* reduces aid to Russia from $148 million (in 2003) to $73 million
* reduces aid to the Ukraine from $155 million to $94 million
* reduces aid to Kazahstan (the largest non-Slavic ex-Soviet republic) from $32 million from $43 million.
* Uzbekistan, Kyrgyzstan, and Tajikistan will together get more than $171 million "in recognition that Central Asia is of strategic importance in fighting terrorism" (55 percent increase over 2003 and a nearly 100 percent rise from levels prior to September 11)
* Turkmenistan gets $8 million ($1 million more than in 2003)
* reduces aid to Eastern and Central Europe from $495 million to $435 million
* reduces aid to Yugoslavia (now, officially, "Serbia and Montenegro"), from $135 million to $113 million
* reduces aid to Macedonia from $50 million to $39 million
* reduces aid to Kosovo from $85 million to $79 million
Source: Radio Free Europe / Radio Liberty
Complete U.S. budget
Damn. Had to do some negotiating past all the upgrade (for $$) info. No excuses for my absence, except I've been trying to change the world. What I dubbed the "Deaf Majority Now" movement is being called "Vermont DPN" - styled after the huge Deaf President Now uprising at Gallaudet in the late '80's. Information on the activist Deaf community can be found at the "Deaf Liberation Front."
I heard Rumsfeld at a press conference the other day, recalling the start of the air campaign - last Friday at 1:00 pm. VT DPN started last Friday at 3 pm. Strange coincidence?
Some economic data about Iraq, according to the Center for Strategic and International Studies (also see CSIS's "Action Strategy for a Post-Conflict Iraq"):
* Iraq's financial obligations (compensation claims, foreign debt, and pending contracts) amount to $ 383,196,000,000.
* Pending contracts with Iraq by country of origin: Russia (90%!!), Netherlands (6%), France (1%), China (1%), Egypt (1%), UAE (1%). Total amounts to $ 57.2 billion.
* Iraq's foreign creditors: Egypt, Poland, Kuwait, Bulgaria, Hungary, the Gulf States, Morocco, Russia, Jordan, Turkey. Debt amounts to somewhere between $62 bilion and $130 billion.
* An analysis of the European media's treatment of the question of Iraqi casualties. Brought to you by the International Herald Tribune, owned by The New York Times, and based in Paris.
* A somewhat critical analysis of Google, and an entire web site dedicated to trashing Google.
* Useful resource about famous people (bibliography).
* An Iraqi blog and the CNN story about it.
* War outsts sex! (in Web searchers)
A limerick from Slaughterhouse Five (an interesting book in view of the war in Iraq):
"There was a young man from Stamboul,
Who soliloquized thus to his tool:
'You took all my wealth
And you ruined my health,
And now you won't pee, you old fool.'"
Finally! Here's what I've been consumed with for the last week. Deaf community votes 'no confidence' over Austine governing body
A page-full of links to alternative media and anti-war sites. Put up by anti-war group Refuse & Resist (According to a politics page linked below, Refuse & Resist is a front group for the Revolutionary Communist Party USA, a Maoist political organization - as is, they say, the more famous Not in Out Name. The same web page alleges that ANSWER - another anti-war organization that has been in the news lately - is a front group for the Workers World Party, another Maoist organization).
My friend Leo was arrested along with others protesting at the local National Guard Recruiting station yesterday. His picture was on the front page of the Reformer. Hannah and I talked about it briefly, she's worried about what his son thinks, I tried to explain that sometimes good people are arrested for doing the right thing. Meanwhile, a friend of hers at school doesn't want her to mail the protest letter she wrote to President Bush because "someone might come get you." AIYY!
Peace activists are not giving up, even if they are considering how to shift gears.
As war comes: Plan B for the anti-war movement by Paul Loeb and Geov Parrish
A radio interview today, on the Jefferson Exchange, with Jim Rough, author of Society's Breakthrough.
Just War -- or a Just War? by Jimmy Carter. (Although Noam Chomsky "think[s], legally speaking, there's a very solid case for impeaching every American president since the Second World War. They've all been either outright war criminals or involved in serious war crimes" (p. 32). (More on Noam below.)
More sites with historical perspectives:
Addicted to War by Joel Andreas
Essays by S. Brian Willson
The Railroad Barons Are Back - And This Time They'll Finish the Job
by Thom Hartmann
More organizations:
Democracy Now
School of Americas Watch
Free Speech on the Web (and TV)
Office of the Americas for Peace and Justice
International Action Center
Voices in the Wilderness
30 countries "willing" to offer public support for the US war, maybe another 15 behind the scenes (Reuters story linked below). Hmmm, that's somewhere in the range of 15-20% "official support." And, most of those governments are not representing the public opinion of their citizens. Yep - WE LOVE DEMOCRACY!
Following some of the links within the Federal Government Stats link posted below by Raz reveals:
Household incomes show white privilege is as strong as ever.
Farm income going up neglects to mention that this is skewed towards corporations, ignoring the fact of family farms shutting down at a continuous and steady pace.
Poverty rate in the US increasing.
Well, let's get that war started and continue post-WWII policy! If you haven't read Noam Chomsky, and you want to understand US international policy, it's time to start. "A study of of the inter-American system published by the Royal Institute of International Affairs in London concluded that, while the US pays lip service to democracy, the real commitment is to 'private, capitalist enterprise.' When the rights of investors are threatened, democracy has to go; if these rights are safeguarded, killers and torturers will do just fine" (p. 21). Chomsky goes on to reveal official US government policy as stated in official documents by policy planners since WWII - actions throughout Central American, Indonesia, the Caribbean, the Middle East, and on and on.
Reading this small booklet (half-size, only 100 pages) will help you decode what G.W. really means when he says trade barriers must fall and new markets be opened (link to his remarks below).
Federal Government Statistics on employment, income, international trade, money, economic output, prices, production, transportation, crime, demography, education, and health.
George Bush on America's handling of foreign affairs (remarks delivered in April 2002 to a California audience): "We have entered the next phase of the war, with a sustained international effort, to rout out terrorists in other countries, and deny al Qaeda the chance to regroup in other places. Across the world, governments have heard this message: You're either with us, or you're with the terrorists."
BUSH'S LEGITIMIZATION OF THE WAR IN IRAQ (excerpts from the National Security Strategy of the USA):
"Traditional concepts of deterrence will not work against a terrorist enemy whose avowed tactics are wanton destruction and the targeting of innocents; whose so-called soldiers seek martyrdom in death and whose most potent protection is statelessness. The overlap between states that sponsor terror and those that pursue WMD compels us to action. For centuries, international law recognized that nations need not suffer an attack before they can lawfully take action to defend themselves against forces that present an imminent danger of attack. Legal scholars and international jurists often conditioned the legitimacy of preemption on the existence of an imminent threatómost often a visible mobilization of armies, navies, and air forces preparing to attack. We must adapt the concept of imminent threat to the capabilities and objectives of todayís adversaries. Rogue states and terrorists do not seek to attack us using conventional means. They know such attacks would fail. Instead, they rely on acts of terror and, potentially, the use of weapons of mass destructionóweapons that can be easily concealed, delivered covertly, and used without warnin [...] The United States has long maintained the option of preemptive actions to counter a sufficient threat to our national security. The greater the threat, the greater is the risk of inactionó and the more compelling the case for taking anticipatory action to defend ourselves, even if uncertainty remains as to the time and place of the enemyís attack. To forestall or prevent such hostile acts by our adversaries, the United States will, if necessary, act preemptively."
According to a Reuters story, the U.S. State Department has announced that "thirty governments have agreed to be named in public as supporters of a U.S. invasion of Iraq, and about 15 others are cooperating behind the scenes [...] The only allies known to be contributing offensive military forces are Britain and Australia, but the Danish government offered on Tuesday to send military personnel [...] The 30 governments, together with the United States, represent some 1.1 billion people, about one-sixth of the total population of the world. The list includes no governments in the Arab world, although states in the six-nation Gulf Cooperation Council are giving logistical support to the U.S. forces expected to invade. The only mainly Muslim countries are Albania, Afghanistan, Azerbaijan, Turkey and Uzbekistan [...] The 30 countries on the list are Afghanistan, Albania, Australia, Azerbaijan, Britain, Colombia, the Czech Republic, Denmark, El Salvador, Eritrea, Estonia, Ethiopia, Georgia, Hungary, Iceland, Italy, Japan, Latvia, Lithuania, Macedonia, the Netherlands, Nicaragua, the Philippines, Poland, Romania, Slovakia, South Korea, Spain, Turkey and Uzbekistan."
* An excellent Newsweek article about America's role in the world (both real and desired).
* An amazingly comprehensive Guide to American Parties, and a directory of political parties in Massachusetts.
From an email by Tom Atlee:
Dr. Robert Muller, former assistant secretary general of the United Nations, now Chancellor emeritus of the University of Peace in Costa Rica was one of the people who witnessed the founding of the U.N. and has worked in support of or inside the U.N. ever since. Recently he was in San Francisco to be honored for his service to the world through the U.N. and through his writings and teachings for peace. At age eighty, Dr. Muller surprised, even stunned, many in the audience that day with his most positive assessment of where the world stands now regarding war and peace.: "The only fault I find with what's reported here is that Dr. Muller allegedly said that 'not one
shot has been fired. Not one life has been lost. There is no war.' This is demonstrably false, at the very least because of greatly increased bombing sorties by US and UK pilots in the Iraqi no-fly zone to "soften them up" for the invasion. See, for example:
Stepped-up air campaign marks 'start' of Iraq war
Allies bomb key Iraqi targets
Pre-war action already under way
I was there at the gathering and I myself was stunned by his remarks. What he said turned my head around and offered me a new way to see what is going on in the world. My synopsis of his remarks is below:
"I'm so honored to be here," he said. "I'm so honored to be alive at such a miraculous time in history. I'm so moved by what's going on in our world today."
(: I was shocked. I thought -- Where has he been? What has he been
reading? Has he seen the newspapers? Is he senile? Has he lost it?
What is he talking about?)
Dr. Muller proceeded to say, "Never before in the history of the
world has there been a global, visible, public, viable, open dialogue
and conversation about the very legitimacy of war".
The whole world is in now having this critical and historic dialogue--
listening to all kinds of points of view and positions about going to
war or not going to war. In a huge global public conversation the
world is asking-"Is war legitimate? Is it illegitimate? Is there
enough evidence to warrant an attack? Is there not enough evidence to
warrant an attack? What will be the consequences? The costs? What
will happen after a war? How will this set off other conflicts? What
might be peaceful alternatives? What kind of negotiations are we not
thinking of? What are the real intentions for declaring war?"
All of this, he noted, is taking place in the context of the United
Nations Security Council, the body that was established in 1949 for
exactly this purpose. He pointed out that it has taken us more than
fifty years to realize that function, the real function of the U.N.
And at this moment in history--the United Nations is at the center of
the stage. It is the place where these conversations are happening,
and it has become in these last months and weeks, the most powerful
governing body on earth, the most powerful container for the world's
effort to wage peace rather than war. Dr. Muller was almost in tears
in recognition of the fulfillment of this dream.
"We are not at war," he kept saying. We, the world community, are
WAGING peace. It is difficult, hard work. It is constant and we must
not let up. It is working and it is an historic milestone of immense
proportions. It has never happened before-never in human history-and
it is happening now-every day every hour-waging peace through a
global conversation. He pointed out that the conversation questioning
the validity of going to war has gone on for hours, days, weeks,
months and now more than a year, and it may go on and on. "We're in
peacetime," he kept saying. "Yes, troops are being moved. Yes,
warheads are being lined up. Yes, the aggressor is angry and upset
and spending a billion dollars a day preparing to attack. But not one
shot has been fired. Not one life has been lost. There is no war.
It's all a conversation."
It is tense, it is tough, it is challenging, AND we are in the most
significant and potent global conversation and public dialogue in the
history of the world. This has not happened before on this scale ever
before-not before WWI or WWII, not before Vietnam or Korea, this is
new and it is a stunning new era of Global listening, speaking, and
responsibility.
In the process, he pointed out, new alliances are being formed.
Russia and China on the same side of an issue is an unprecedented
outcome. France and Germany working together to wake up the world to
a new way of seeing the situation. The largest peace demonstrations
in the history of the world are taking place--and we are not at war!
Most peace demonstrations in recent history took place when a war was
already waging, sometimes for years, as in the case of Vietnam.
"So this," he said, "is a miracle. This is what "waging peace " looks
like."
No matter what happens, history will record that this is a new era,
and that the 21st century has been initiated with the world in a
global dialogue looking deeply, profoundly and responsibly as a
global community at the legitimacy of the actions of a nation that is
desperate to go to war.
Through these global peace-waging efforts, the leaders of that nation
are being engaged in further dialogue, forcing them to rethink, and
allowing all nations to participate in the serious and horrific
decision to go to war or not.
Dr. Muller also made reference to a recent New York Times article
that pointed out that up until now there has been just one superpower-
the United States, and that that has created a kind of blindness in
the vision of the U.S. But now, Dr. Muller asserts, there are two
superpowers: the United States and the merging, surging voice of the
people of the world.
All around the world, people are waging peace. To Robert Muller, one
of the great advocates of the United Nations, it is nothing short of
a miracle and it is working.
The next anti-war action is a rolling candle-light vigil.
Per request: a map of hate groups in the U.S. from the Southern Poverty Law Center's Intelligence Project.
...and then, one day, the rich man from Baghdad decides to send his servant to the marketplace to buy some fruits for him. So the servant saddles up his horse and rides to the marketplace. When he gets there, lo and behold, right in the middle of the marketplace, he sees Death looking at him. What's more, Death is making a threatening gesture towards him! Cold shivers down his spine, the servant gallops home and tells his master what he had seen. They decide that the servant should leave town as soon as possible and go to Amman. So the master gives him the fastest horse he has, and the servant wastes no time in starting for Amman. The next day, the rich man decides he wants to see with his own eyes what his servant had seen. So he rides to the marketplace, and, sure enough, there's Death, looking straight at him. He gathers his wits and approaches Death and asks Her: "Why did you make a threatening gesture towards my servant yesterday?" "It wasn't threatening gesture," Death replies. "It was a gesture of surprise. I was surprised to see him in Baghdad, when I knew I had an appointment with him for tonight, in Amman..."
The Cooptation of Adam Smith
Who knew that 20 years prior to The Wealth of Nations, Adam Smith wrote a tome on moral philosophy. ìWhen we consider the character of any individual, we naturally view it under two different aspects; first, as it may affect his own happiness; and secondly, as it may affect that of other peopleî (Part VI). Smith's views of the power of the nation-state as a necessary counterbalance to the myopic profit drive of business have been ditched completely in favor of selective concentration upon so-called principles of "free trade" and
Contemporary neo-liberal policies (liberalism is ok when applied to capital, just not when applied to people), have reified only those aspects of Smith's work which serves their purposes, discarding the rest. In fact, discussion of ethics has no place in the business literature, let alone as a determinant of business practice. One might even dare to say that the extent to which the capitalist system wreaks damage on the world and humanity is reflective in the depth of silence about ethics. It's not as if the individuals in corporations, politics, trade negotiations, policy-making etc don't know the ramifications of what they do: it is simply taken as a matter of course; an unfortunate, unintended consequence; the post-modern, cynical mode of survival. Adam Smith has been hijacked; and we're all onboard.
ìHow selfish soever man may be supposed, there are evidently
some principles in his nature, which interest him in the fortune
of others, and render their happiness necessary to him, though he
derives nothing from it except the pleasure of seeing itî (Part I).
I've always considered the United Nations to be the next, best chance for a global structure that could limit not only the power of individual nation-states, but also the newer version of Empire being constructed by transnational, capitalist corporations. The first stated ideal of the UN Charter is "to save succeeding generations from the scourge of war" (yet someone has just published a book on war being necessary to the existence of the nation-state, I'll catch you with the reference next time).
The authors of Empire, Hardt and Negri, while criticized, point to another source of resistance: "The newest and perhaps most important forces in the global civil society go under the name of non-governmental organizations (NGOs). The term NGO has not been given a very rigorous definition, but we would define it as any organization that purports to represent the People and operate in its interest, separate from (and often against) the structures of the state....we are most interested in a subset of NGOs that strive to represent the least among us, those who canno represent themselves. These NGOs, which are sometimes characterized broadly as humanitarian organizations, are in fact the ones that have come to be among the most powerful and prominent in the contemporary global order. Thier mandate is not really to further the particular interests of any limited group but rather to represent directly global and universal human interests. Human rights organizations (such as Amnesty International and Americas Watch), peace groups (such as Witness of Peace and Shanti Sena), and the medical and famine relief agencies (such as Oxfam and Medicins sans frontiers) all defend human life against torture, starvation, massacre, imprisonment, and political assassination. Their political action rests on a universal moral call - what is at stake is life itself" (p. 321-313).
And then there's this from Hermann Goering (Hitler's second-in-command): "Naturally, the common people don't want war, but after all, it is the leaders of a country who determine the policy, and it is always a simple matter to drag the people along whether it is a democracy, or a fascist dictatorship, or a parliament, or a communist dictatorship. Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is to tell them they are being attacked, and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. It works the same in every country" (1939).
Raz will no doubt remind me that it's also the people who fight the most for social justice who seem to have the least amount of trust in "the people's" ability to resist. Or did I just read that somewhere recently? Another search!
Raz is going to join me here in cyberspace. He tries hard to come off as just a slacker, but actually he's a Romanian-born Superman.
For posterity's sake, here's an article about my partner's harassment at the high school where she teaches. This happened two years ago when the Vermont Legislature was debating whether or not to legalize civil unions, thereby becoming the first in the United States to recognize a form of gay marriage.
A sad loss for the Deaf community, world-renowned ASL poet Dr. Clayton L. Valli died Friday of complications from stomach cancer.
Born in Newburyport, MA on May 25th, 1951, he was the son of the late Francis S. Valli, Jr. He was a 1971 graduate of Austine School for the Deaf in Brattleboro, Vermont. He graduated witih a B.A. degree in Social Psychology in 1978 from the University of Nevada-Reno, and with a M.A. Degree in Linguistics in 1985 from Gallaudet University in Washington, DC. He completed his doctorate in Linguistics and ASL Poetics at the Union Institute in Cincinnati, Ohio in 1993 and worked as a professor, a consultant, a presenter, and a trainer related to ASL Poetry and linguistics at the Gallaudet University. After his retirement he continued to work as a part time editor for the Gallaudet University Press and enjoyed traveling around the world as a Lecturer.
In lieu of flowers, Clayton's wishes were to establish a Scholarship that will be set up for Deaf Children wanting to continue their education. Memorial donations may be sent to the Dr. Clayton L. Valli Scholarship Fund, c/o Frances Eaton, 37 Folly Mill Terrace, Seabrook, NH 03874.
Todd scores! From an email: Is anyone interested in getting together before Wed classes to discusses the articles? [....] I'm trying to be Steph. Those who don't know steph-Steph organizes classmates into fine tuned study groups as good as any eastern european dictator.
He also sends links to Cultural Studies Papers and Articles from the Communication Department at the University of Iowa and to his own onlineanthology - an eclectic collection of links to articles representing the interests of his own warped mind. (Some of them look interesting, but he's just trying to butter me up after the slam. I know the type.)
Students in the UMass writing class have selected 3 blogs each to analyze over the rest of the semester. Here are their choices:
Kate: Ghost in the Machine, greg.org - writing about making movies, writing about art, by greg allen, and Lights Out Films.
Marika: I Am A Dancer, katecohen.com, and the pieces of my life.
Jay: The Bird House: scot hacker's foobar blog, Fuzzy Blogic: Jake's Journal, and Musick.
Jeff: Stand Down: The Left-Right Blog Opposing an Invasion of Iraq,
Beyond Corporate, and Leftist Propaganda.
Rebecca: ADLAND, ME3DIA.COM: blue and white and read...sometimes, and PR Opinions.
Lisa: His and Hers, Bill and Kent's Place, and
Jen: The Modern Age, Cubicle Dweller, and DaveBarry.com.
Katania: Blue Line, Red Line, and Green Line.
Allison: The Bearded Lady, Steph and Lola Do UMass, and Well you should be happy for me.
Dawn: anything but ordinary, It's not news, it's FARK.com, and Inside My Brain.
Kayleen: Fabian Gonzalez, my so-called blog, and spitting image.
Jenn: blueblanketblog, Vegan Blog: The (Eco)Logical Weblog, and everyforest.
Julie: Big Frog Weblog, Single Mom, and My Little Life.
Paula: blogdogs.com, DC Dog News, and Steven Hatch's weblog.
Ingrid pointed out the anonymity of my blog - I had - conveniently?! - overlooked the fact that my name appears nowhere! Will fix that now.
Last night was my "spirituality group" gathering. Carole was absent due to pre-pneumonia, but the rest of us enjoyed dinner and some good laughs. After updating everyone on the trials and tribulations of my life over the past month, my so-called friends (!) described my life as a soap opera, "Steph's Soap,' and seemed eager for the next installment. Nothing like an almost assault, relationship stress, and academic enlightenment/disillusionment to fuel a dramatic (comedic?) story. I was on the verge of ending the evening on a depressing note as we considered the state of the world and this seemingly soon-to-be war with Iraq; however, my tending-to-the-optimistic nature has been being nurtured by reading phenomenology: "...givenness gives and gives itself, therefore confirms itself, not because it possesses itself, but because it abandons and abandons itself, does not hold itself back and does not hold back" (Marion, p. 60).
Some reasons why regime change in Iraq is desirable; and more resources for nonviolent ways of accomplishing this end:
The Albert Einstein Foundation, including 198 Methods of Nonviolent Action.
The Nonviolent Peaceforce is "committed to third-party nonviolent intervention."
Peace Brigades International promotes nonviolence and seeks to protect human rights.
"The Vernal Project is a long-term effort to create a comprehensive education and support network that can bolster and sustain grassroots progressive social change movements in the United States."
Finally, some resources for teachers: an article on homophobia from my old pal, Warren Blumenfeld; and an article in the current issue of the Journal of Applied Communication Research, "The Dark Side of Instruction: Teacher Anger as a Classroom Norm Violations." (Scroll down to read the abstract.) This research was done on college student's perceptions of appropriate and inappropriate displays of teacher anger. The reference list may include articles that have more direct bearing on elementary and secondary settings.
It would have to be karma inserting itself between a connoisseur and her Girl Scout Cookies.
How else could one explain the coincidence of an unwitting oversight more than a month ago surfacing in the midst of significant negotiations?
Meanwhile, a legal challenge to Bush's presumed "authority" to unilaterally declare war.
Some news from MoveOn about the emergency petition to the UN -"Less than two days after the petition was launched, over 550,000 people have signed, from over 200 countries." They report placing more than 100 ads in local newspapers this past Wednesday.
Info on Irag from American Friends Service Committee .
Today is a national student walk-out day. There were a number of people in the UMass campus center, but I opted to attend Lauren's presentation on "Williams people" instead (as did a dozen other intrepid comm majors). Intriguing.
Meanwhile, Monday night I had dinner with Laurene, and she told me about life in DC since 9-11. She was at work at Gallaudet when the plane hit the Pentagon and watched the smoke spiral up from her office window. Since then, the city's been like it's under siege - constant military presence on the streets and in the skies, helicopters overhead with searchlights, all hours of the night and day. She was commenting on the general naivete of Americans, but particulalry of those of us away from the most obvious targets of terrorism, and how easy it is for us to talk peace, while fear stalks the residents of our nation's capital. The smoke from that attack is emblazoned in her memory, as is the scene of everyone streaming out of the Capital as threat of another plane-turned-missile arose. The sniper attacks didn't help. The day the police arrested the two snipers she said people POURED out of their homes - a night/day difference - reveling in the relative release from the grip of fear.
Yao Mean looks like someone to watch...
I haven't said anything about the philosophy class I'm taking because the language is so arcane...but Monday night Briankle lived up to rumor, producing one of his infamous chalkboards AND using one of the tabletops as an extension for more scribbles. While you're checking it out, you might explore the rest of the weblog where it's posted; looks interesting.
Just found this link attached to a story about the Gay and Lesbian Anti-Defamation League's (GLAAD) campaign with the National Organization of Women (NOW) to protest Michael Savage moving from radio to television. (His website features stories to arrest anti-war leaders and save the pledge of allegiance...) Civil liberties, anyone?
Activism for the 60's crowd? Check out Code Pink.
Introduction to The Handbook of Organization Studies
Organizations, Organization, and Organizing
By Stewart R. Clegg & Cynthia Hardy
Approach: ìto conceptualize org. studies as a series of conversationsÖ. relating to
organizations as empirical objects
organization as theoretical discourse, and
organizing as social process,
and to the intersections and gaps between and within themî (p. 3).
[Deeply imbued with communication theory!] ñ ìSuch conversations and their associated practices arrange the organizational arena as a contested terrain: one where scenes are configured, agencies enrolled, interests translated, and work accomplished, a space in which the empirical object is constitutedî (p. 4). ìOrganization theory matters because it not only reflects organizational practice, but helps constitute itî (p. 23).
Seeks to be ìa mapî (p. 1) through Org. Studies history and itís tensions: ënormalí and ëcontraí science, the paradigm wars (and the wielding of incommensurability as a conceptual weapon), politics, and the unrepentant emergence of new organizational forms.
Organization theory as a sequence of overlapping narratives (p. 14):
1) organizations as rational instruments
2) organic, humanistic side -> functionalist, contingency theories
3) emphasis on the market -> org. economics & population ecology
4) the many faces of power
5) melding of knowledge and power (reveals institutional biases on the microsocial level)
6) societal, institutional structures -> institutional theory and globalization
The ìthree-corneredî (p. 5) incommensurability debate. (Most intense debates between rebels [horizontal hostility]):
o Possibility of building bridges between paradigms
o Conversion from one paradigm to another
o The old way or die (i.e., Donaldson)
Academic approaches: contingency theory, organizational ecology, economic and psychological, sociological (institutional theory), and feminist, critical, and postmodern theories. [Not to mention COMMUNICATION! J - ìThe connection of theory and practice invariably draws on particular conceptions of what is to count and not to count as dataî (p. 13). ìÖthe status of representation: on how representation occurs, and what it is that is being representedî (p. 13).
ìFrom Bureaucracy to Fluidity: New Organizational Formsî ñ ìchanges have led to increasing diversity and fluidity, and decreasing certainty and structureî (p. 11).
Bureaucracy - functionalist, emphasizing ìconsensus and coherence rather than conflict, dissensus and the operations of powerî (p. 2). This ënormal scienceí paradigm has been joined by interpretativist, radical humanist and radical structuralist paradigms, plus postmodernism ñ ìthat which is marked by discontinuity, indeterminacy and immanence (Hassan 1985)î (p. 2).
ìThe newly found fluidity in the external appearance of organizations rests on the assumption that the interorganizational relations into which an organization enters may be a more important source of capacity and capability than internal features such as ësizeí or ëtechnologyí (p. 9). [Not only context, but relationships more important than form?]
For example: critical linkages, clusters, networks, (p. 9); strategic alliances (p. 10).
To be successful:
1) new external relations require new internal ones (p. 10)
2) majority are designed on a ëdistributedí modelÖteam-based, decentralized (p. 10-11)
3) ìhierarchies become one means among many to coordinate and control actions across people, knowledge, time and spaceî (p. 11)
Current Issues in Organization Studies: ìÖdifferent conceptualizations not only provide insight and illumination, but also produce silences around certain issues and themes, particularly issues pertaining to levels of analysisÖî (p. 16).
o Strategy (deconstructed)
o Leadership (trait -> style -> contingency -> New Leadership/Super Leadership)
o Decision-making (from rationality to power dynamics). Is decision-making conceptualized as coherent or chaotic, problem-solving or political? (p. 17)
o Cognition (negotiation as a central topic and the dominance of a cognitive orientation) (p. 17)
o The constitution of ìthe subjectî ñ individual and organization
o Diversity (a ìproblem?î)
o Work group performance in relation to technology (little understood, as illustrated by îa misunderstandingÖof the differences between information and communicationî (p. 18) ìIt is through communication that we negotiate the meanings of technological infrastructureî (p. 18).
o Metaphors of ìcommunicationî and ìorganizationî ñ ìour images of organizations are largely shaped by the metaphors that represent organizing, not the way communicating and roganizinag co-produce each otherî (p. 18). We need new metaphors!
o Technology ñ ìboth a process and a productî (p. 18)Öîbot a cause and a consequence of structureî (p. 19).
o Innovation ñ 4 tensions: internal/external focus, old/new, directing strategy/allowing it to emerge, freedom/responsibility.
o Organizational Learning ñ ìoxymoron? ìÖto learn is to disorganize and increase variety; to organize is to forget and reduce varietyî (p. 19).
o Place of the natural environment (term usually doesnít mean the eco-environment)
o Globalization ñ organization both instigate and are on the receiving end (p. 20)
Reflections on the relationship(s) between theory, research, and practice.
o Different kinds of data ñ ìData represent the empirical world, the one that we invent, rather than discover, through our researchî (p. 20).
o Action research ñ bridge between theory and practice, emphasis on reflexivity.
o Emotion and organizing ñ ìif organizations are socially constructed, emotions are central to their constructionî (p. 21).
o The whole person ñ aesthetics
o Time and temporality ñ 3 main time problems that organizations must solve: the reduction of temporal uncertainity, conflict over time; and scarce timeî (p. 22)
o Culture
o Power ñ ìthe least understood concept in organization analysisî (p. 22)Öîa curiously inactive conceptualization: we know more and more about the way power works on us but less and less about how we might make it work for usî (p.23).
ìThe potential, for both theory and practice, resides in our ability to transcend the debate between normal and contra science and to engage with the duality and ambiguity of organizational lifeî (p. 23)Öîthe way forward is the ethical interrogation of experience in terms of what our practices mean to us and to othersî (p. 24).
Just a quickie today:
Who has the most effective propaganda, Israel or the Palestinian Authority?
